Web 2.0 is dead and I have killed it. Right here, right now. Do not pass go, do not collect $200 million from a wussy-Valley-V.C. The beast lie slain in a digital heap of bits and bytes and asynchronous server calls. This is no phoenix - there will be no rebirth, no emergence from its own ashes. For the future to come, there must be a revolution. There must be a drastic departure - a sharp turn away from the sins of the past.
The hype, the beta, the usability errors in the guise of a “release early, release often” mantra, the rounded corners, the shiny tables, the nonsensical “Our original name was taken so we re-spelled it” domain names, the social networking site for xxxxxx, the social bookmarking xxxxxx, the video sharing xxxxxx, the it might not be quite legal but sign up anyway we care about your privacy xxxxxx, the business model? hah!, the Ajaxified, Flashified, Scriptified, Ruby-on-Railsified, Adsense-supported, made possible by your generous donations, content-lacking, MySpace ripoff (could you not find a better site to base yours on?!), start pages, tagging schmagging, long tail, pseudo-wannabe-innovation, Googlebait, oh please oh please Google buy my product please oh please I love and worship you and somehow think I have made something better than your engineers and how could you pass up buying this product that doesn’t even work but don’t blame me it’s just in beta and we couldn’t afford to do usability testing so we’re pretending to let some serial-joining geeks have some super-exclusive private access so they’ll do all the bug-testing for us and blog about it all for free and then our servers will explode because everybody on the world wide net was conned into thinking that private and exclusive meant awesome and so tried to sign up on the first day and we couldn’t do anything about it because we were busy drinking beer and watching Diggnation rather than coding and buying servers and paying attention and actually learning from the mistakes that everyone else has made a dozen hundred thousand million times.
It’s over for me. Dead. Gone. I’m done. I’m ready for a Web that actually works as advertised. A Web that lets people actually communicate with one another. A Web that lets you own what you post and read what you want to where you want to. A Web that lets you decide when you want to see an advertisement, and when you want to hear sound, and when you want to sign up, and when you want to destroy all traces of your account. A Web that departs from the metaphor of pages - that understands it is not print - that a web page is not like a newspaper page or a magazine page or a book page. A Web that is not so full of bugs and holes and 500, 501, 503, 404 errors. A Web that I can use and find value in without giving away my email address and remembering a password and whether your stupid site disallows special characters or requires numbers or is case sensitive. A Web where A-listers don’t bitch and moan about hierarchy in the publishing world in one breath and in the next uphold that same hierarchy by being stingy with links in order to protect their “authority.” A Web less intent on replacing things, and more on making things better. A Web that is non-restrictive, that doesn’t lock me in, one made by and for people, not machines. A Web that remembers when I ask it to, and forgets - really forgets - unless I tell it not to. A Web that is accessible, standards-compliant, usable, but not afraid to take risks. A Web intent on offending, alienating, polarizing, politicizing, persuading, teaching, inciting. A Web with a point to make, however contradictory. A Web with a story to tell, not just news to report. A Web where people aren’t afraid to comment or participate - where the geeks and early adopters aren’t self-righteous assholes ready to scream NOOB the minute someone asks a question. A Web of people and ideas and art and culture and poetry and connection and love and desire and experimentation and guessing and trial-and-error rather than corporations and greed and money and Truth and property. A Web kinda sorta maybe a little bit more like this. A Web less like a cloud and more like the rays of the sun. A Web that feels more friendly because it’s made up of my friends. A Web I can believe in. A Web I can trust. A Web that is fun. A Web in which it’s okay - even awesome - that Everything is Miscellaneous, because it is, and it should be, and it’s better that way.
It’s coming - I can tell. Something insanely awesome is just now peeking over the horizon. I can’t wait.
Die, Web 2.0, die.
18 June 2007
Die Web 2.0, Die.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


8 comments:
you had me at your dunkin donuts coffee sludge post, kevin. my question is, when will your book be out? =)
as i navigate my way from noob to early adopter, frivolous motion is one of my favorite signposts along the way.
i'd like to think that in web 4.0, we'll be kindred-tribes even if i am behind on the learning curve and totally suck at photoshop.
Aww thanks again! As for the book, well, I’m actually thinking there might be an ebook in the cards by year's end, but time will tell.
Man, even though it's midnight, I feel like some coffee sludge. Mmm.
Do you hope the same thing as me? ... which is that someday, I hope, the web will be enough like "real-life" interaction that I don't feel lonesome if I have more friends who are far away or who I actually met online than those I see "IRL" on a day to day basis?
I think the problem with web 2.0 is, with the emphasis on "user generated content," that it's all about ME ME ME. And hopefully the next interwebtubes can be about US US US.
Missa - yes, I do.
The separation between Online and Real Life has always felt illusory to me, and I welcome the day that these two worlds collide in such a way that the illusion disappears.
What tantalizes me so much about the Web is this promise of connecting people who in Real Life might never have met - exposing the great fabric connecting all of life.
The future is sharing. Some privacy concerns will pop up, but people will start to share. Then things get interesting.
The Japanese language has no indigenous word for "privacy." Why would you, when you lived in a house with paper walls?
I bet most pre-modern civilizations didn't have a word for it either.
It's a modern, Western concept. And it may soon be an antiquated one. If Myspace has shown us anything, it's that the next generation is up to that level of connectivity, where having everything about you all over the internets is de rigeur.
What annoys me is the judgements of the previous generation. I "toned down" my facebook page and changed my profile picture in anticipation that professors, and not just friends or potential friends, might be looking at it. And fair or not, they'd see me bragging about being the first female to divest herself on the quad after senior brunch and think that I'm a dumb exhibitionist who can't work seriously. Nor would I want my man's little sister, who is my friend on Facebook, to show their parents my former page.
I erase my signature (consisting solely of my blog url) when I e-mail my dad because I don't want him reading about how much I love alcohol. He wouldn't approve.
In real life, we keep these things from our elders too. We censor ourselves depending on who we're talking to. And there should be a better way to do so on the internet, so that I don't have to censor myself for some audiences at the expense of not expressing myself to others.
I spelled "de rigueur" wrong. I think I used it right, though...
here's an insight into the lines we blur that separate our Real Life from our Online existence. i found this post (http://www.nik.com.au/archives/2006/09/19/dead-20-outed/) a couple of months back:
'Some time ago I decided that there was no point in having a pseudonym (I was forced into that when my hacker handle and real name were linked together for the first time) or in trying to remain anonymous. Now it is just about dealing with who you are and trying to not be a dick while online - welcome to the web, where just like in one of those bad dreams, both you and everyone else is naked."
i personally don't think it's possible to "hide" ourselves the minute we sign up for anything on the web. and former pages are not an easy thing to get rid of when google, and other search engines, keep things on cache.
versions of ourselves that we wish we could hide, can step into closets, but in some shape or form, they find ways to come out and haunt us.
in web 4.0, that's the part that i'm hoping we could get rid off - skeletons in the closet.
missa, i think the concept of no privacy is deeply ingrained in the filipino psyche.
people ask strangers what to a western mind are the rudest of questions:
how much do you make at your job?
why did you gain so much weight?
Post a Comment