31 July 2007

FCC Wireless Auction Rules Announced Today

The FCC is set to rule today on the upcoming 700MHz radio band auction rules. The auction is a place where telecommunications giants such as AT&T, Sprint, and Verizon try to snap up available frequencies on which to build their networks. The difference this time around, however, is that internet-search giant Google has entered the fray.

A couple weeks ago, Google published an article on its new Public Policy Blog announcing its intent to enter the auction, and big at least $4.6 billion (the reserve price for the auction), provided the FCC create rules that Google said would increase competition and fairness in the wireless space. Specifically, Google asked for:

  • Open applications: consumers should be able to download and utilize any software applications, content, or services they desire;
  • Open devices: consumers should be able to utilize their handheld communications device with whatever wireless network they prefer;
  • Open services: third parties (resellers) should be able to acquire wireless services from a 700 MHz licensee on a wholesale basis, based on reasonably nondiscriminatory commercial terms; and
  • Open networks: third parties (like Internet service providers) should be able to interconnect at any technically feasible point in a 700 MHz licensee's wireless network.
These demands have been met with considerable acclaim, as well as a bunch of criticism - (particularly from a few of the current leaders in this realm). This afternoon we will hear the decision of the FCC, and if the rules are not set in Google’s favor, it will be extremely interesting to see what their response might be. Google really wants a chunk of this spectrum, for reasons not entirely clear. The possibilities are intriguing. And much more interesting than what we might expect the Good Ol’ Boys to do.

Now we wait.

30 July 2007

Broadway Hates Hollywood

Many theatre artists are incredibly resistant to the idea of utilizing film on stage. Call it jealousy, call it fear of being replaced by this “new” media, call it a (natural, I suppose) egotistical desire to be “noticed” by the audience - whatever motivates it, the fact remains that whenever the possibility of using film is mentioned, there is resistance. Rarely does someone not utter, “I think it’s really cool to use film, but we have to make sure that it doesn’t distract from what the actors are doing.”

But why should the hard work of the filmmakers and screen actors be artificially made any less important than that of the on-stage performers? And frankly, what if what they have put together is better than the play itself - more polished - as it frequently is?

Theatre’s problem is that it treats itself as the ultimate art, capable of assimilating music, poetry, painting, sculpture, dance, and film, but falsely believes that it offers something of its own that makes it far more important, relevant, and true. This arrogance leads it to treat its absolutely primal elements as incidental. “Liveness” (as something exclusive to theatre) is held above everything. But it doesn’t exist.

Theatre is the ultimate art - but only because the rest are perfect themselves, and it provides a platform to democratically combine them - erasing the arbitrary, imagined distinctions between each, and allowing life to exist as it does.

If we’re to talk about the arts as separate (for sake of debate), we must admit that theatre can not exist without the others.

But film, music, literature, dance, architecture, painting, and sculpture (etcetera) will be just fine on their own, thank you.

27 July 2007

Tasty Del.icio.us Links Of The Day

Ton of links for the weekend. Because what else could you possibly be doing?

Email Addiction

I’m seeing a lot of these “email addiction” articles lately. They all say things like “the average American checks his/her email 5 times a day.”

What’s weird to me, I guess, is the concept of “checking” your email.

Somehow that seems so antiquated - a callback to the dial-up days of yore.

I don’t check email anymore - I get email. Like I get a phone call.

And I’m not just talking about my iPhone.

What about you? How often do you “check” your email? Are you “addicted?”

Got Fat Friends? Sucks To Be You, Says Harvard Study

A study of 12,067 people over a period of 32 years has found that social networks have a marked influence on weight gain. For example, if a person’s close friend becomes obese, that person’s chances of becoming obese increase 57 percent; for siblings, increase is 40 percent; and for spouses, increase is 37 percent.
Read this fascinating Harvard Med. study

Apparently geographic factors have nothing to do with the correlation either. Which is to say, even if you have fat friends in Honolulu, you still might become obese.

Very interesting.

One might assume that siblings with obesity have an effect (genetics), or that spousal relations would (eating the same food), but the effect of social networks is even greater than these relationships. Why?
Most likely, the interpersonal, social network effects we observe arise not because friends and siblings adopt each other’s lifestyles. It’s more subtle that that. What appears to be happening is that a person becoming obese most likely causes a change of norms about what counts as an appropriate body size. People come to think that it is okay to be bigger since those around them are bigger, and this sensibility spreads.
Some issues with the studies’ assumptions, perhaps, but it’s certainly a novel way of looking at the data, and incredibly concerning if true.

When I first read it, I thought for sure it had something to do with Web 2.0.

Maybe it does, after all.

26 July 2007

Are You Good At Catching Phish(ing)?

Pardon the stupid pun in the title - this is an important post.

McAfee (virus killers) has a great 10-question test to see how honed your anti-phishing and internet security skills are. The test presents side-by-side screenshots of popular e-commerce, banking, and social networking websites (you know, the ones that have all your sensitive information), and you have to guess which one is authentic.

At the end of the test, they show some really nice graphics that point out some of the telltale signs of a phishing site or email. Here’s the one for Bank of America:



It’s harder than it sounds (though I managed to get 10 out of 10). Phishers are getting good these days.

If you’re scratching your head right about now, wondering what the heck I’m talking about - this test is mandatory, as is this article.

Be safe.

500 Posts!

Well, this is actually number 501, but the fact remains that Frivolous Motion (as in the blog, not me - my name is Kevin) has reached a milestone. And we’re not far from another, bigger milestone: the one year anniversary of Frivolous Motion.

I’m pretty excited about this, and really grateful that I have a bunch of extremely cool readers from all over the world. It’s you guys that make doing this worthwhile. In the next couple months, I hope to add some new features, and I am working on a free e-book of some of the highlights of the past year plus some new insights that have never been seen. Which reminds me - if you have a favorite post that you’d like to see in all its formatted PDF glory, leave a comment here, and I will strongly consider sticking it in.

Thanks for sticking around. There’s much more to come!

If you haven’t already, now just might be a great time to go back to the beginning.

25 July 2007

Tasty Del.icio.us Links Of The Day

Link Time! Some very thought-provoking stuff in this episode.

Stubbornness Is A Disease

Just like alcoholism, anorexia, and yes, pregnancy, stubbornness is a disease.

The first symptoms of it are often displayed at a very young age, but one must be careful not to misdiagnose what might just be a moment of quite natural and health childish egoism. When symptoms persist into “of-agedness,” however, it becomes clear that what is taking place is most unhealthy.

Subjects display extreme unwillingness to change position on even the most trivial matters of debate, often becoming irritatingly unreasonable and strongly defying logic, group consensus, and other practical matters. They irrationally cling to the first thought that enters their diseased minds, even when contrary evidence is presented from a reliable source. Changing the mind of one afflicted with stubbornness is often an exercise in futility and frustration, but this hardly means it is not worth a try.

Diseased individuals appear as normal in nearly every other way (though often possessing of a particularly distracting, and therefore infuriating, identifying feature such as a somewhat beakish nose). Therefore, it is not easy for friends and family of the afflicted to recognize that many of the most infuriating, mean, and stupid things she does - actions commonly associated with “assholes” or “bitches” - are not, in fact, under her control.

Stubbornness has no cure, but its symptoms may be treated as they occur, with varying degrees of effectiveness. Studies have found that the best way to deal with a Stubborn - as those with this condition are known - is by leveling a sharp blow to the face using a fist, or some other heavy, blunt object (a simple carpenter’s hammer is desirable to this end, though take care not to employ its forked end too frequently). Repeated doses are often quite necessary and/or desirable, and there should be no fear of over-medicating in this way.

Until the disease of stubbornness is no longer passed down genetically (or acquired through social conditioning - there is still a debate about its origins in medical circles), the insidious nature of this disease will plague mankind in all walks of life. Our best defense, therefore, is a good offense, and this means taking the initiative to seek out and medicate those afflicted with the disease. Do not hesitate to take drastic prescriptive measures, even if the subject protests, (and she shall quite mightily at times).

She knows not what is good for her. She has a disease. Her faults are not her own.

It is all for the best.

24 July 2007

Social Networking: Are You Committed?

How many of the social networking sites you’re a part of do you visit every day? For how many do you do more than sign in (i.e. send messages, post content, add applications, etc.)? Which sites would you say you’re an active member of, and for which are you merely “a number”? Are there any that you’ve for which you’ve signed up - never to return? Which ones? Why?

What value do you find in the sites you actively use? Do they allow you to do something you can’t elsewhere, or do they just do it better? Is the design of the site important to you? Are the sites you actively use well-designed or ugly? How simple is it to do what you want to do? Are there extraneous steps?

Do you do anything to create revenue for the sites you use? Do you click ads, buy stuff, have a paid account?

Which one social site would you refuse to give up? And how much would you pay to keep it?

23 July 2007

Rethinking Privacy In An iPhone Age

An iPhone security hole leads a BBC writer to one of the most cogent articles I’ve seen about privacy, security, and business in this new, networked world. Bill Thompson argues that if we are to gain anything from the tools of the future, we must more closely consider exactly which data is and should remain private. Birthdates, high school mascots, maiden names, and all the usual “security questions” no longer qualify. Who doesn’t want to get presents from tons of people, after all?

He writes:

But when it comes to loans, credit cards and other financial services it really is up to the banks to adapt to the networked world, not us.

I do not want to make 6 October, 1960 a secret date. Nor do I want to have to remember who knows that my mum's maiden name was Clubbs or that I went to Southwood Comprehensive School.

In the networked world people can find out these things about me, and so anyone who wants to verify my identity should realise that they can no longer rely on them in any way. If they continue to do so then they should be responsible for the consequences, not me.

And if identity theft is becoming easier because of our widespread use of the internet then the ways in which identity is established have to shift to reflect that.

We cannot rely on assumptions that served the Victorians and limit our use of these new tools just because profit-starved credit card issuers are unwilling to improve their inadequate procedures.

The problem here is not Facebook, it is the antiquated thinking of lazy companies.
Read the entire article here: Apple iPhone issue highlights security debate.

In Search Of Lost Horcruxes

The book of the century has at long last been released. This past Friday, thousands (millions?) of screaming children (of all ages) lined up on street corners (often beyond), to purchase the final installment of one of the most successful book series of all time. Yes, of course I’m talking about J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter, and yes, I am a fan (though not one that stood in line - I use Amazon.com pretty exclusively these days to feed my fetish for the printed word).

I’m only halfway through Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows at the moment - on account of having been in Connecticut all weekend rehearsing Better This Way for the New York International Fringe Festival (tickets now available, and the show is a tiny bit like Harry Potter but not at all, which excuses the plug just a tiny bit but not at all) - but so far it is everything a fan could hope for.

I won’t give anything away, because I guess people find that mean (though I can hardly think of the last film/play/book I’ve watched/snored-through/read for which I didn’t already know pretty much the entire plot), but I will just say that if you’ve so far managed to avoid the cultural phenomenon that is Harry Potter (in principle, or by a some amount of sub-rock-living), now is absolutely a good time to start. The books read extremely fast - partially on account of Rowling’s somewhat bland prose style (a good thing, because you can focus on the story, which is pretty magnificent) - and are rather addicting (addictive). Think Lays potato chips.

Give it a chance, and you might be pleasantly surprised. I held out for five years before picking up the first book. I’m glad I did (pick up the book, not hold out for so long).

Speaking of seven-book series, this is the only one I can think of that’s better. And it is way better, but hey, it’s Proust, after all.

Tasty Del.icio.us Links Of The Day

Long list of links to get the week started with a bang. Enjoy!

20 July 2007

YouTube Custom Video Player

As has been semi-widely reported, YouTube has introduced a new “custom player” feature that lets you do some semi-fancy stuff to the default embeddable box like change the color scheme (totally fancy, see). I’ve got a sample below, filled with a couple videos I’ve apparently marked as “favorites” (click menu to see the rest).

YouTube keeps getting better, smarter, and more customizable (there’s word of corporate accounts on the way, too). If they can start upping the quality of the video (HD, perhaps?), and offer widescreen formats, I think television will at last have a true competitor (the partnerships with AppleTV and iPhone are going to be important in the future). But it’s not yet time. Have patience, dear revolutionaries.



(Sorry to anyone who can’t see the video player, including lucky iPhone owners, but especially to any of you that use the Frivolous Motion dashboard widget, because I know it kind of breaks it.)

19 July 2007

Tasty Del.icio.us Links Of The Day

In this edition: Web Usability, Spalding Gray’s Body Smashed With A Brick, Email Overload, Harry Potter (are you getting the book on Saturday?), and more.

Click a link, any link...

Windorphins: Like Endorphins, Except They CAUSE Pain


Kevin Kelleher from GigaOM perfectly sums up my feelings about eBay’s insanely awful “windorphins” marketing blitz.

And yet it was more nausea than euphoria that I felt going to windorphins.com (a domain that eBay actually had to strongarm a journalist into giving up). It’s peppered with video ads that all made me cringe and colorful blobs with blinking eyes, which I guess windorphins are supposed look like. You can even design your own windorph avatar. (Caution: If you try this, do not click on the “jazz hands” tab. It may induce thoughts of suicide.)
Read the rest of the post here. And then buy something on Amazon.com.

18 July 2007

Fear Of Death

Fear of death is the motivation behind all human achievement, invention, and behavior.

All consumer products are an attempt to cheat death, to prolong life, to increase the quality of the limited days we spend on Earth.

We search for ways to keep our cities clean, and ways to decrease the amount of physical effort necessary to perform common tasks. Drugs, air conditioning, faster systems of transportation, cryogenics - humanity strives toward the immortal. We fight and fight and fight every single day to somehow change our supposed destiny.

When others die, we feel weak. When they conquer disease, it is as though we had ourselves.

When a child is born, though, we taste forever. The biological thread ties our life with theirs, and in our dreams we imagine them growing old, making miraculous discoveries, and drinking the sap of the Tree of Everlasting Life.

But we share this same connection with all of life - with our neighbors, with the lakes and forests, with the grizzly bear and the chickadee. Immortality is all around us - it is nature. Everlasting life can be found in the links between all things in the universe. It exists in the atoms constantly moving, constantly being exchanged. It exists in the space between the atoms - and the great mystery of what we can’t see. It exists in the way another is changed physically, chemically, intimately, every time you speak, every time you move, every time you think.

What if you could live forever?

What if you already can?


UPDATE: My mother emailed a great response that very much deserves to be tacked on to this post.

She writes:

Imagine a world where love (not fear) is the motivation behind all achievement, invention, and behavior.

What a different day you would greet each morning if you chose what you do because of love, not fear...
My mom totally gets it. Right on.

17 July 2007

Tasty Del.icio.us Links Of The Day

The Return of the Links!

The Best In E-Commerce

Mashable, the social networking news site, has recently been posting a bunch of (what they call) “toolboxes” - long, themed lists of useful links to services and websites and downloadable content. This morning they put up a great one called E-Commerce Toolbox: 30+ Leading E-Commerce Sites

Well worth a bookmark if you ever do any shopping on the Web.

Be sure to check out some of Mashable’s other fabulous lists, too (many can be found at the end of the post under “See Also”). Whatever you’re looking for, chances are they’ve got it covered.

16 July 2007

Ratatouille Is Delicious


Ratatouille is a movie worth watching this summer. The latest in Pixar’s growing line of innovative, brilliant, and fantastically entertaining animated features (and the first with Disney at the helm), is more than a joy to watch. The movie, which I saw in Hartford on Friday, is a triumph in the field of digital animation on one hand, and a lesson in storytelling and smart cartoon humor on the other. The animation is dazzling, the characters well-developed, interesting, and likable, and the brief flashback towards the end of the movie is one of the most moving moments of cinema in recent memory. Ratatouille is worth watching (and paying) for those thirty seconds if for no other reason.

Is it Finding Nemo? Toy Story? Monsters, Inc.?

Hard to say.

It just might be better.

Especially if you like cooking.

15 July 2007

Change Is Good

This post is not promoting a Bank of America service that helps you save money.

Nor is it an advertisement for an inexpensive chicken sandwich.

It is also not about a new blog layout, or a lengthy diatribe about how great life is even though everything that seems it could go wrong does, or pizza toppings, or anything of the sort.

It’s not about politics, or quantum mechanics, or taste, or fashion, or switching from Mac to PC (lord, no!).

It is not about language, or friends, or careers, or religious beliefs, or family shakeups, or the weather, or death, or transferring schools, or downloading music, or channel surfing, or the new set of stoplights that might never get installed because a town likes being a small, simple place.

This blog post is not about grammar, or language, or spelling, or literature, or mathematics, or Philip Glass, or an investigation into cultural differences in color recognition.

It’s not an announcement of anything new for Frivolous Motion. I’m not changing the blog. I’m not changing jobs.

I’m not (lord, no!) getting married or having kids.

This blog post is just business as usual. Life as usual. Just a tiny celebration of the world and its dynamism. A way of saying thank you, life, for being so unpredictable.

And to ask a question:

What’s new with you, lately?

13 July 2007

Freakonomics Blog Kinda Sucks These Days

Back in May, Freakonomics Blog announced they were getting an editor for the first time - a woman named Melissa Lafsky - and she has since joined the team of Levitt and Dubner in posting on the site throughout the week. I recognize the reasons why they added her to the team (they probably have a book they want to spend time on, for one), but I can’t help but think the quality of the blog has suffered since her arrival.

The quantity of posts seems to be up, but a large part of this is due to completely worthless and fit-for-your-grandmother’s-blog posts about some random holiday of the day called “And Today Is...” I don’t read Freakonomics to know that yesterday was Different Colored Eyes Day, nor do I in the least care. It’s entirely possible that the rest of their posts remain as quality as one would expect, but I can’t take them seriously anymore. I’m certain that Lafsky adds a lot more to the Freakonomics team than these trite articles, and it’s a pity that they’re the only ones to which her name gets attached, but it pulls the quality of the blog down so far that it is difficult to keep reading.

Goodness knows I’m not arguing against covering a multitude of topics (one glance at the tag cloud above tells you this is something I am quite guilty - and quite proud - of). What I am saying, however, is that if you add a feature to your site, you need to make sure it’s worthwhile to your readers. This one fails that test.

Besides, what are they going to do next year? Rerun blog posts? We’re in more trouble than I thought!

12 July 2007

Making The Case For Twitter, More Or Less

Copyblogger puts it quite persuasively (if unintentionally):

On November 19th, 1863, popular orator Edward Everett gave a two-hour speech that nobody remembers. Following Everett, President Abraham Lincoln stood up, delivered 269 words now known as the Gettysburg Address, and sat down. Lincoln’s two-minute speech is regarded as one of the greatest in American history.
Vaspers the Grate continues to drive this point home, as well.

My mom always said, “If you can’t say it in 140 characters or less (fewer...let’s talk supermarket checkout lines), it is probably not worth saying.”

Perhaps that wasn’t my mom. But she’s into the simplicity thing, too. Especially when it comes to food. Mince words. Eat chicken.

Brevity(ness) is next to Godliness.

This post is too long already.

11 July 2007

Trying Out Some Podcasts

I subscribed to a podcast for the first time yesterday. Actually, I signed up for two: Diggnation (in video form) and Grammar Girl’s Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing. The latest episode of Diggnation as well as the last 30 or so GG shows are now sitting on my iPhone, ready to be checked out.

One thought that continues to nag at me, however, is that this medium feels so ancient, so closed, so pointless. It’s a one-way dialogue in the manner of the evening news (and even they broadcast live). In order to comment, you need to make your own podcast (or write on a related blog that some podcasters also run). Where’s the communication? Where is the ability to talk back in realtime in the same medium? I mean, even in radio listeners are allowed to call in as the show is happening. What, ultimately, is the point? Podcasts seem hopelessly stuck between the exciting, uncensored world of the live, and the edited, polished, and reflective world of the previously recorded.

Anyone with more experience in this realm have some thoughts?

10 July 2007

Typographical Toys For Little Multilingual Girls And Boys


Call it a multilingual set of building blocks, Toypography (created by Dainippon Type Organization) is a typographical puzzle set consisting of brightly-colored wood pieces that can be assembled into letters - spelling words like bird, bear, fish, tiger, horse, among others.

Where does the multilingual come in?


Well, each set of blocks can also be assembled into the Japanese character(s) for the same word (as well as a couple goofy “drawings” of the animal).


This is an extremely cool deconstruction of the basic shapes of letter-forms, and I particularly love it for the high level of abstraction it applies to the shapes we instantly recognize as letters and give meaning.


Check it out here
(via)

09 July 2007

The Plague Of The Theatre

Why does theatre suck?

Why is it still hanging on for dear life despite predictions about its demise since the advent of the moving picture?

Why are old plays performed more frequently than new plays (and given much more funding)?

Why do people get paid to call themselves “Prop Mistresses”?

Why do actors rarely use their actual props and costumes prior to the week the show opens?

Why are theatre-people afraid to hear the name Macbeth uttered before the curtain goes up?

Why does it take three people to press a button to run a lighting cue, and why can’t the one who physically touches the button see the stage?

Why do people continue to practice the art of bullshittery by calling themselves dramaturgs?

The answer to these questions, and the reason theatre is so out of touch, fighting for money, and typically not worth attending:

Tradition

tra·di·tion [truh-dish-uhn] -noun

  1. the handing down of statements, beliefs, legends, customs, information, etc., from generation to generation, esp. by word of mouth or by practice, and followed faithfully for no good reason - often to the absolute detriment of civilized society and the natural order.
Even so-called “experimental theatre” falls into the tradition crap trap. It’s just so disappointing.

By the way, if you’re thinking, “Well, the reason they do things like they always did is because certain things just work,” you are wrong. They don’t. Theatre is still dying a slow, painful death. And whether it finally passes in my lifetime or the next doesn’t remove the fact that it is this way of doing things “as they’ve always been done” that is killing it. Just because it worked before doesn’t mean it works now. If a musician insisted on selling his albums only on 8-track cassettes, he would be laughed at. If a filmmaker used equipment that was introduced at the dawn of the 20th century, his work would fail to meet the standards of a contemporary film business, and an audience accustomed to high-definition digital content with brilliant surround sound, color, contrast, and fidelity. If a poet wrote sonnets...okay, she would probably be extremely successful, but poetry is pretty awful (and not especially financially lucrative), one must admit.

Tradition is an evil killer - a plague of the world of art-making. Masterpieces are deadly illusions - we worship them in a vain attempt to pretend to be smarter and more cultured than the rest of our friends and family. I really, really, really, really don’t want to see another version of Hamlet, or Antigone, or The Glass Menagerie ever again. There is nothing important or particularly special about these works except that they are old and “were popular in their day,” which is not enough to make me care about them over the work of someone who is still living. And it is certainly not enough to make them the least bit relevant.

If a monkey with a word processor and enough paid overtime could eventually come up with the exact words of Shakespeare (yes, this is mathematically possible), you kinda sorta have to take things just a little bit less seriously.

I mean, think of it: There is a huge, ongoing controversy about who actually wrote Shakespeare’s plays. What if he was actually an overweight female cyber-elf with three arms, seven microchips to replace heart and brain, and no eyes or mouth, who just so happened to get dropped in Stratford-upon-Avon by a rabid alligator stork from Outer Space as part of an ingenious plot to destroy Earth?

Which absolutely begs the question:

Was Hamlet mad, or did he just feign madness?

06 July 2007

10 Things I Want To Do On My iPhone

...but can’t. Or at least can’t figure out how, or it hasn’t worked yet.

  1. Sync PDFs and other documents from a folder on my computer using iTunes or something.
  2. Use Del.icio.us to bookmark things I read on the Web.
  3. Open links in a new tab/window that don’t already specify this in the HTML.
  4. Save passwords. It has done a decent job of this so far - even logging me into Blogger using my Google credentials, which I can’t do on my laptop!, but it has a ways to go to be as functional as the desktop version of Safari/Camino/Firefox. Especially since my password has numbers and special characters, typing it in time after time gets a little annoying.
  5. Change the volume of a song while in Cover Flow (landscape) view without using the physical button on the side of the phone.
  6. Mark all of my really old mail as read, to get rid of the little red unread message indicator on the home screen. I’ve seen it all months ago, Apple, thanks.
  7. Email more than one photo at a time.
  8. Find my own YouTube videos and/or login to my account so I can rate movies.
  9. Magically create a Wi-Fi network where one doesn’t exist
  10. Save the whales.

Blogging From iPhone

It’s a breeze, really, and the keyboard works brilliantly - even in portrait mode, which I’m finding I prefer because it lets me see more of the text area.

It seems as though Blogger only offers HTML view, just like on Safari on my Mac. That is just fine for me, because I know how to use it, but it is about time the full functionality was offered. Hello...Google...can you hear me? Safari is no longer a super-small market player you can safely ignore. Just last weekend alone 700,000 people became users. Time to give them some of the kick-ass functionality that we’ve come to expect.

05 July 2007

I Bought An iPhone

I am back from vacation (though it is actually another week and couple days long, there is work to be done) and wouldn’t you know it, somehow I managed to buy an iPhone (8GB model). In fact, without at all intending to (I swear!), I bought it the day after its release in Hartford, Connecticut, at Westfarms Mall (which has an Apple Store - to my surprise and downfall). Rationality abandoned me on Saturday and I made a completely unnecessary and rather expensive purchase. In spite of already paying for cellular service I hardly use, and an iPod Nano that has been collecting dust recently as a result of broken earbuds, I plopped down 634 of my hard-earned dollars on what is without a doubt the most amazing little thing I’ve ever had the pleasure to hold.

The first swipe of my finger to unlock the store model was all I needed to know that the iPhone and I were destined to be together. Truly magic, I tell you. Truly magic.

Was it a frivolous purchase? Yes. Is it worth it? Totally. Down to the last cent.

More on my iPhone in the coming weeks. And more Frivolous Motion starting now.